Monday, June 7, 2021

Neuraminidase inhibitors tamiflu and relenza

 Neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) are a class of drugs which block the neuraminidase enzyme. They are commonly used as antiviral drugs because they block the function of viral neuraminidases of the influenza virus, by preventing its reproduction by budding from the host cell. Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) a prodrug, Zanamivir (Relenza), Laninamivir (Inavir), and Peramivir belong to this class. Unlike the M2 inhibitors, which work only against the influenza A, neuraminidase inhibitors act against both influenza A and influenza B.[1][2][3][4] The neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir were approved in the US and Europe for treatment and prevention of influenza A and B. Peramivir acts by strongly binding to the neuraminidase of the influenza viruses and inhibits activation of neuraminidase much longer than Oseltamivir or Zanamivir.[5] However, Laninamivir in the cells is slowly released into the respiratory tract, resulting in long-lasting anti-influenza virus activity. Thus the mechanism of the long-lasting activity of laninamivir is basically different from that of Peramivir.[6]

The efficacy was highly debated in recent years.[7][8][9] However, after the pandemic caused by H1N1 in 2009, the effectiveness of early treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors in reducing serious cases and deaths was reported in various countries.[10][11][12][13]

In countries where treatment of influenza like illness are done using neuraminidase inhibitors on a national level, statistical reports show a low fatality record for symptomatic illness because of the universal implementation of early treatment using NAIs.[14] Although oseltamivir is widely used in these countries there have been no outbreaks caused by oseltamivir-resistant viruses and also no serious illness caused by oseltamivir-resistant viruses has ever been reported.[14] The United States Centers for Disease Control continues to recommend the use of oseltamavir treatment for people at high risk for complications and the elderly and those at lower risk who present within 48 hours of first symptoms of infection.[15]

Common side effects include nausea and vomiting. The abnormal behaviors of children after taking oseltamivir that have been reported may be an extension of delirium or hallucinations caused by influenza.[14] It occurs in the early stages of the illness, such as within 48 hours after onset of the illness. Therefore, children with influenza are advised to be observed by their parents until 48 hours after the onset of the influenza illness, regardless of whether the child is treated with NAIs.[14]

orexin receptor antagonist

 Dayvigo is an orexin receptor antagonist...it blocks neurotransmitters that promote wakefulness.

It isn’t likely to cause rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms when stopped...but don’t expect it to fly off shelves.

Dayvigo doesn’t seem to work better than benzos or “Z-drugs”... and it has additional adverse effects and interactions.

For example, Dayvigo can rarely cause transient leg weakness... or sleep paralysis during sleep-wake transitions.

Plus it can cause “sleep driving” and daytime impairment... similar to benzos and Z-drugs.

And watch for interactions, since it’s metabolized by CYP3A4.

Expect Dayvigo to cost about $1.60/dose.

Orexin (/ɒˈrɛksɪn/), also known as hypocretin, is a neuropeptide that regulates arousalwakefulness, and appetite.[1] The most common form of narcolepsy, type 1, in which the sufferer experiences brief losses of muscle tone (cataplexy), is caused by a lack of orexin in the brain due to destruction of the cells that produce it.[2][3]

There are only 10,000–20,000 orexin-producing neurons in the human brain,[2] located predominantly in the perifornical area and lateral hypothalamus.[1][4] They project widely throughout the central nervous system, regulating wakefulness, feeding, and other behaviours.[1] There are two types of orexin peptide and two types of orexin receptor.[5][4]

Orexin was discovered in 1998 almost simultaneously by two independent groups of researchers working on the rat brain.[6][7] One group named it orexin, from orexis, meaning "appetite" in Greek; the other group named it hypocretin, because it is produced in the hypothalamus and bears a weak resemblance to secretin, another peptide.[2] Officially, hypocretin (HCRT) is used to refer to the genes and transcripts, while orexin is used to refer to the encoded peptides.[8] There is a high affinity between the orexin system in the rat brain and that in the human brain.[5]

The orexin system was initially suggested to be primarily involved in the stimulation of food intake, based on the finding that central administration of orexin-A and -B increased food intake. In addition, it stimulates wakefulness, regulates energy expenditure, and modulates visceral function.

Wakefulness[edit]

Orexin seems to promote wakefulness. Recent studies indicate that a major role of the orexin system is to integrate metabolic, circadian and sleep debt influences to determine whether an animal should be asleep, or awake and active. Orexin neurons strongly excite various brain nuclei with important roles in wakefulness including the dopaminenorepinephrinehistamine and acetylcholine systems[18][19] and appear to play an important role in stabilizing wakefulness and sleep.

The discovery that an orexin receptor mutation causes the sleep disorder canine narcolepsy[20] in Doberman Pinschers subsequently indicated a major role for this system in sleep regulation. Genetic knockout mice lacking the gene for orexin were also reported to exhibit narcolepsy.[21] Transitioning frequently and rapidly between sleep and wakefulness, these mice display many of the symptoms of narcolepsy. Researchers are using this animal model of narcolepsy to study the disease.[22] Narcolepsy results in excessive daytime sleepiness, inability to consolidate wakefulness in the day (and sleep at night), and cataplexy, which is the loss of muscle tone in response to strong, usually positive, emotions. Dogs that lack a functional receptor for orexin have narcolepsy, while animals and people lacking the orexin neuropeptide itself also have narcolepsy.

Central administration of orexin-A strongly promotes wakefulness, increases body temperature and locomotion, and elicits a strong increase in energy expenditure. Sleep deprivation also increases orexin-A transmission. The orexin system may thus be more important in the regulation of energy expenditure than food intake. In fact, orexin-deficient narcoleptic patients have increased obesity rather than decreased BMI, as would be expected if orexin were primarily an appetite stimulating peptide. Another indication that deficits of orexin cause narcolepsy is that depriving monkeys of sleep for 30–36 hours and then injecting them with the neurochemical alleviates the cognitive deficiencies normally seen with such amount of sleep loss.[23][24]

In humans, narcolepsy is associated with a specific variant of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex.[25] Furthermore, genome-wide analysis shows that, in addition to the HLA variant, narcoleptic humans also exhibit a specific genetic mutation in the T-cell receptor alpha locus.[26] In conjunction, these genetic anomalies cause the immune system to attack and kill the critical orexin neurons. Hence the absence of orexin-producing neurons in narcoleptic humans may be the result of an autoimmune disorder.[27]

Food intake[edit]

Orexin increases the craving for food, and correlates with the function of the substances that promote its production. Orexin is also shown to increase meal size by suppressing inhibitory postingestive feedback.[28] However, some studies suggest that the stimulatory effects of orexin on feeding may be due to general arousal without necessarily increasing overall food intake.[29]

Review findings suggest that hyperglycemia that occurs in mice due to a habitual high-fat diet leads to a reduction in signalling by orexin receptor-2, and that orexin receptors may be a future therapeutic target.[30] Leptin is a hormone produced by fat cells and acts as a long-term internal measure of energy state. Ghrelin is a short-term factor secreted by the stomach just before an expected meal, and strongly promotes food intake. Orexin-producing cells have recently been shown to be inhibited by leptin (through the leptin receptor pathway), but are activated by ghrelin and hypoglycemia (glucose inhibits orexin production). Orexin, as of 2007, is claimed to be a very important link between metabolism and sleep regulation.[31][32] Such a relationship has been long suspected, based on the observation that long-term sleep deprivation in rodents dramatically increases food intake and energy metabolism, i.e., catabolism, with lethal consequences on a long-term basis. Sleep deprivation then leads to a lack of energy. In order to make up for this lack of energy, many people use high-carbohydrate and high-fat foods that ultimately can lead to poor health and weight gain. Other dietary nutrients, amino acids, also can activate orexin neurons, and they can suppress the glucose response of orexin neurons at physiological concentration, causing the energy balance that orexin maintains to be thrown off its normal cycle.[33]

Addiction[edit]

Preliminary research has been conducted that shows potential for orexin blockers in the treatment of cocaine, opioid, and alcohol addiction.[34][35][36] For example, lab rats given drugs which targeted the orexin system lost interest in alcohol despite being given free access in experiments.[37][38]

Studies of orexin involvement in nicotine addiction have had mixed results. For example, blocking the orexin-1 receptor with the selective orexin antagonist SB-334,867 reduced nicotine self-administration in rats and that smokers who suffered damage to the insula, a brain region that regulates cravings and contains orexin-1 receptors, lost the desire to smoke.[39] However, other studies in rats using the dual orexin receptor antagonist TCS 1102 have not found similar effects.[40]

Lipid metabolism[edit]

Orexin-A (OXA) has been recently demonstrated to have a direct effect on an aspect of lipid metabolism. OXA stimulates glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and that increased energy uptake is stored as lipids (triacylglycerol). OXA thus increases lipogenesis. It also inhibits lipolysis and stimulates the secretion of adiponectin. These effects are thought to be mostly conferred via the PI3K pathway because this pathway inhibitor (LY294002) completely blocks OXA effects in adipocytes.[41] The link between OXA and the lipid metabolism is new and currently under more research.

Mood[edit]

High levels of orexin-A have been associated with happiness in human subjects, while low levels have been associated with sadness.[42] The finding suggests that boosting levels of orexin-A could elevate mood in humans, being thus a possible future treatment for disorders like depression.

Do omega-3 fatty acid supplements reduce CV risk?

 Mounting evidence suggests they don’t...despite prior evidence with Rx Vascepa (icosapent ethyl), a form of EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid).

Vascepa 2 g BID is approved to reduce CV risk in some high-risk patients with elevated triglycerides despite statins.

Now evidence suggests that adding Rx Epanova 4 g/day for about
 3 years does NOT improve CV outcomes in high-risk patients on statins.

Epanova is a combo of EPA and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) for severely high triglycerides over 5.6 mmol/L.  But it’s not approved in Canada...since the company was awaiting results of this CV trial.

Other new data show no CV benefit of a European omega-3 product with 1.8 g/day EPA and DHA after about 2 years in seniors with a recent heart attack.

Plus older studies with omega-3 doses of about 1 g/day are conflicting or suggest only slight benefit in some CV patients.

The contrasting data have researchers scratching their heads.

Some question if DHA negates the CV benefit of EPA.  Or if Vascepa’s results were inflated by the study’s mineral oil placebo, which may have increased CV risk...possibly by reducing statin absorption.

For example, mineral oil raised LDL and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.   This wasn’t seen with the Epanova study’s corn oil placebo.

Educate that the CV benefits of omega-3s seem questionable... and all omega-3s may NOT have the same effects.  Keep in mind, fish oil supplements have both EPA and DHA.

Consider risks.  Rx omega-3s are linked with increased risk of atrial fib...and omega-3 doses above 3 g/day may increase bleeding.

Plus Vascepa costs about $320/month.

Advise saving Vascepa for patients with severely high triglycerides...to possibly reduce the risk of pancreatitis.

Don’t rely on omega-3s for CV benefits.  If needed, reinforce other measures...an optimized statin, BP control, smoking cessation, etc.

If a patient wants to use a fish oil supplement, encourage them to get one with a Health Canada Natural Product Number (NPN).

But point out that CV benefit isn’t likely, no matter the dose or source (krill oil, etc).

Explore our chart, Omega-3s: Fish Oil and More, for guidance about dietary intake...and a deeper dive into the evidence.

View additional resources.

Key References

  • JAMA 2020;324(22):2268-80
  • Circulation Published online Nov 15, 2020; doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052209
  • N Engl J Med 2019;380(1):11-22

Pharmacist’s Letter Canada. January 2021, No. 370105

heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)

  HFrEF occurs when the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is 40% or less and is accompanied by progressive left ventricular dilatation and adverse cardiac remodeling. -Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Review - PubMed (nih.gov)

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a form of heart failure in which the ejection fraction – the percentage of the volume of blood ejected from the left ventricle with each heartbeat divided by the volume of blood when the left ventricle is maximally filled – is normal, defined as greater than 50%;[1] this may be measured by echocardiography or cardiac catheterization. Approximately half of people with heart failure have preserved ejection fraction, while the other half have a reduction in ejection fraction, called heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).[1]

Risk factors for HFpEF include hypertensionhyperlipidemiadiabetessmoking, and obstructive sleep apnea.

HFpEF is characterized by abnormal diastolic function: there is an increase in the stiffness of the left ventricle, which causes a decrease in left ventricular relaxation during diastole, with resultant increased pressure and/or impaired filling.[2] There is an increased risk for atrial fibrillation and pulmonary hypertension.



For example, explain that patients with HFrEF feel better and live longer with “triple therapy”

 1)...an ACEI, ARB, or Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan) 

2)PLUS an evidence-based beta-blocker (carvedilol, etc) 

3) AND aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone, etc).

  • Eur J Heart Fail Published online Sep 18, 2020; doi:10.1002/ejhf.2008
  • J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71(2):201-30
  • Circulation 2016;134(6):e32-e69
  • J Card Fail 2011;17(8):664-9

Thursday, March 5, 2015

 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):219-29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9.

Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Strong evidence shows that physical inactivity increases the risk of many adverse health conditions, including major non-communicable diseases such as coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and breast and colon cancers, and shortens life expectancy. Because much of the world's population is inactive, this link presents a major public health issue. We aimed to quantify the eff ect of physical inactivity on these major non-communicable diseases by estimating how much disease could be averted if inactive people were to become active and to estimate gain in life expectancy at the population level.

METHODS:

For our analysis of burden of disease, we calculated population attributable fractions (PAFs) associated with physical inactivity using conservative assumptions for each of the major non-communicable diseases, by country, to estimate how much disease could be averted if physical inactivity were eliminated. We used life-table analysis to estimate gains in life expectancy of the population.

FINDINGS:

Worldwide, we estimate that physical inactivity causes 6% (ranging from 3·2% in southeast Asia to 7·8% in the eastern Mediterranean region) of the burden of disease from coronary heart disease, 7% (3·9-9·6) of type 2 diabetes, 10% (5·6-14·1) of breast cancer, and 10% (5·7-13·8) of colon cancer. Inactivity causes 9% (range 5·1-12·5) of premature mortality, or more than 5·3 million of the 57 million deaths that occurred worldwide in 2008. If inactivity were not eliminated, but decreased instead by 10% or 25%, more than 533 000 and more than 1·3 million deaths, respectively, could be averted every year. We estimated that elimination of physical inactivity would increase the life expectancy of the world's population by 0·68 (range 0·41-0·95) years.

INTERPRETATION:

Physical inactivity has a major health eff ect worldwide. Decrease in or removal of this unhealthy behaviour could improve health substantially.

FUNDING:

None.


Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Benzodiazepines Tied to Dementia in Elders


Benzodiazepine drugs are associated with increased risk for dementia, according to a BMJstudy.
The study included nearly 1100 community-dwelling, older adults in France who were free of dementia; 9% were considered new users of benzodiazepines — that is, they began using the drugs after the third year of follow-up.
During the next 15 years, dementia was diagnosed significantly more often in new benzodiazepine users than in nonusers (32% vs. 23%). After adjustment for confounders such as age, diabetes, and depression, new users had a 60% increased risk for dementia. A complementary, nested case-control analysis found a similar increase in risk.

The researchers argue against the idea that benzodiazepine use is simply a marker for other conditions (e.g., anxiety) that are linked to dementia — for example, the association between the drugs and dementia increased after 7 years of use. However, they acknowledge that such a theory cannot be "entirely ruled out."

Newer Oral Anticoagulants Associated with 'Dramatic Increase' in Bleeding After ACS


When used to prevent thrombotic events after an acute coronary syndrome, the newer oral anticoagulants (for example, apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) are associated with increased rates of major bleeding that offset their antithrombotic benefit, according to anArchives of Internal Medicine meta-analysis.
Researchers examined seven randomized controlled trials comprising over 30,000 patients who were hospitalized with ACS and received antiplatelet therapy. Compared with placebo recipients, those on new-generation oral anticoagulants had "a dramatic increase in major bleeding events." Significant (but moderate) reductions in the risks for stent thrombosis and other ischemic events were seen, but there was no significant effect on overall mortality.

An editorialist concludes that routine use of these drugs in patients with ACS "is unwarranted."
Acute coronary syndrome is a term used for any condition brought on by sudden, reduced blood flow to the heart.