Archives' Studies Call into Question Statins for Primary Prevention

Two papers in the Archives of Internal Medicine cast doubt on the benefits of statins for primary prevention.


In a meta-analysis, researchers combined data from 11 placebo-controlled trials of statin use in some 65,000 high-risk patients without cardiovascular disease at baseline. During nearly 4 years of treatment, LDL levels were lower in statin than in placebo users (mean, 94 vs. 134 mg/dL) — but there was no difference in all-cause mortality. Editorialists say the analysis "makes it clear that in the short-term, for true primary prevention, the benefit, if any, is very small."


In another paper, investigators took a closer look at the JUPITER trial, in which rosuvastatin reportedly lowered cardiovascular risk by 50% among patients without heart disease or hypercholesterolemia but with high C-reactive protein. The investigators say the trial was "flawed" — it was stopped too early, data on cardiovascular mortality were lacking, and more than half the researchers had financial ties to industry. Accordingly, they conclude: "The results of the trial do not support the use of statin treatment for primary prevention."